I was once an RGN (Registered General Nurse) student. I went into nursing to be a missionary, not kill people, so when I found out there were secret plans not to resuscitate patients, and other ways they finished up without the planned resuscitation, I went on Channel 4 TV News in England to try to expose the practices. However I would describe the TV broadcast as a clever cover-up. They actively refused to allow me to quote evidence of a planned resuscitation that did not occur, even though the patient and relatives thought a resuscitation would be performed in the event of a cardiac arrest.
If you want to see just how bad the secret practices were just see the paper that was published by one of the hospitals I worked in, where I made complaints about subjects like "The Hollywood Code" "Light Blue" or "The slow code".
Aarons / Beeching Paper, Fazakerley Hospital Liverpool England, BMJ Dec 1991.
I was once an RGN (Registered General Nurse) student. I went into nursing to be a missionary, not kill people, so when I found out there were secret plans not to resuscitate patients, and other ways they finished up without the planned resuscitation, I went on Channel 4 TV News in England to try to expose the practices. However I would describe the TV broadcast as a clever cover-up. They actively refused to allow me to quote evidence of a planned resuscitation that did not occur, even though the patient and relatives thought a resuscitation would be performed in the event of a cardiac arrest.
If you want to see just how bad the secret practices were just see the paper that was published by one of the hospitals I worked in, where I made complaints about subjects like "The Hollywood Code" "Light Blue" or "The slow code".
Aarons / Beeching Paper, Fazakerley Hospital Liverpool England, BMJ Dec 1991.
Jesus and Bible .com
Where Jesus is Lord!
Interesting links about the KJV bible!
note: these are links described as "interesting" I do not necessarily agree with every statement on the links. I believe certain "defenders" of the KJV go too far, as they say the KJV is as pure and as much inspired as the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts that were first written by Moses and the disciples of Jesus. I disagree with them over that. Only the original Greek and Hebrew are "inspired" and the word for word perfect Word of God is somewhere found in the many manuscripts. The right manuscripts need to be identified by Faith. The KJV is simply the best version (I repreat version) of the correct type of manuscripts. Indeed I would go as far as to say it is racist to say the English were given a perfect version, and no other nation. I am open to seeing a future translation of the Textus Receptus type manuscripts, that is written in more modern English, but the "New King James Version" is corrupt, and does not fulfil such a hope.
Original KJV with archaic spelling:
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611-Bible/
Changes in the King James Version:
http://www.bible-researcher.com/canon10.html
Cambridge and Oxford KJV
http://www.bibleprotector.com/editions.htm
(subject) What is a pure KJV?
http://biblicalscholarship.net/AV.htm
